Current:Home > Stocks'Something needs to change.' Woman denied abortion in South Carolina challenges ban -EquityExchange
'Something needs to change.' Woman denied abortion in South Carolina challenges ban
View
Date:2025-04-16 14:46:36
Taylor Shelton said she isn't ready to be a mother. She'd been using birth control for years — an intrauterine device (IUD), which is said to be more than 99% effective.
She'd just gotten the device checked by a doctor when she missed her period in September.
"When I found out I was pregnant, I was shocked to say the least," Shelton told NPR.
Shelton and her boyfriend decided together that she would get an abortion. But South Carolina's fetal heartbeat ban had just taken effect.
"I thought, 'Luckily, I'm under six weeks. This shouldn't be hard,'" said Shelton. "And then it turned out to be unbelievably hard."
Shelton ultimately had to travel out of state to get an abortion.
"It was unnecessary, and it was traumatizing," said Shelton. She's now suing the state, alongside Planned Parenthood, arguing the ban's parameters are vague and make it nearly impossible to get an abortion.
"The government want[s] us to be responsible. Well, I'm telling you right now — I had birth control. I tracked my period. I took the pregnancy test as soon as possible," said Shelton. "And even then, I could not figure out how to get this procedure done."
Questions persist on when during pregnancy the ban applies
Since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, most Republican-controlled states have enacted abortion bans of some kind.
In South Carolina, the Republican-dominated General Assembly passed an abortion ban after a "fetal heartbeat" is present.
Republican lawmakers at the time argued that South Carolina was becoming "an abortion destination state," as women facing strict bans across the South sought abortions.
The ban defines a fetal heartbeat as "cardiac activity, or the steady and repetitive rhythmic contraction of the fetal heart, within the gestational sac."
That has been interpreted as around six weeks of pregnancy, before most women know they are pregnant.
But physicians who specialize in reproductive health have called the "fetal heartbeat" language misleading.
Vicki Ringer, the director of public affairs for Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, said the definition describes two different points in pregnancy: an electrical impulse that appears at roughly six weeks and an actual heart, which Ringer said does not begin to form until at least nine weeks.
"This is what happens when you have legislators that try to practice medicine," said Ringer.
It's not the first time the ban's language has been called into question. Even as the state Supreme Court upheld the law six months ago, its chief justice noted the fetal heartbeat definition is ambiguous, writing, "we leave for another day" the question of when "cardiac activity" is said to take place.
Planned Parenthood and Shelton are asking the state court to clarify the ban and allow abortions up to at least nine weeks.
"Nine weeks will allow about 50 percent of the patients that come to see us [to get an abortion]," said Ringer, adding they currently only provide the procedure to 10 percent of those seeking it.
After the lawsuit was filed, the state attorney general said his office has defended the law in the past and will continue to do so.
Ringer said the ambiguity of the ban, coupled with the threat of criminal charges for abortion providers, has led to a chilling effect in the state and has left patients like Shelton vulnerable.
'My blood is boiling about it'
Shelton said she filed the lawsuit so other women wouldn't have to go through a similar experience.
After learning she was pregnant, she immediately called her gynecologist and asked the receptionist how to get an abortion.
"'Do you know where I can get help,'" Taylor remembers asking. "'Do you have any resources for me?' And each answer was, 'no, no, no.'"
Next, Shelton called Planned Parenthood, which has two clinics that provide abortion in the state. But the ban had left them overwhelmed. They could not see Shelton before six weeks.
Shelton then started to search online and found a pregnancy center in North Carolina, which has a 12-week ban requiring two appointments; one for counseling where an ultrasound is performed, another for the abortion itself.
Shelton said the center told her they could see her quickly and perform the ultrasound.
"My mom came with me. We drove four hours to Charlotte," she said. "The moment I stepped foot in that place, I felt uncomfortable."
She said it felt like a bait and switch.
"It was anything that could prevent me from the idea of an abortion, that abortion is bad," said Shelton.
When Shelton insisted she wanted an abortion, she said the center would no longer give her an ultrasound.
"It turns out this place was a fake abortion clinic, an anti-abortion clinic," said Shelton.
Ringer said crisis pregnancy centers are popping up across the Southeast, appearing on searches for abortion services but then only offering anti-abortion information when women arrive.
But Shelton was also experiencing pain. She let the counselor know, explaining her IUD was still in place.
"And immediately it was, 'Oh my goodness, you need to go to the hospital. Your baby could be in danger,'" said Shelton. "Not me, but the baby could be in danger."
Shelton left the pregnancy center in tears and immediately called her gynecologist. The doctor removed the IUD, which was bent, and said that was what was likely causing Shelton's pain.
Shelton finally connected with Planned Parenthood in North Carolina. After two more trips, she got an abortion at six weeks, four days pregnant.
"It's so surreal. I could have never seen this happening to me. And now that it has, I mean, my blood is boiling about it," Shelton said, adding she can't imagine what would have happened if she did not have the support of her family, the means to travel, and money for all the appointments.
"I think that my story shows the six-week ban is not enough time to be fair and that something needs to change."
veryGood! (1)
Related
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- Environmental Justice Plays a Key Role in Biden’s Covid-19 Stimulus Package
- Microsoft applications like Outlook and Teams were down for thousands of users
- Meta allows Donald Trump back on Facebook and Instagram
- Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
- The Senate's Ticketmaster hearing featured plenty of Taylor Swift puns and protesters
- Migrant crossings along U.S.-Mexico border plummeted in June amid stricter asylum rules
- For a Climate-Concerned President and a Hostile Senate, One Technology May Provide Common Ground
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- The $16 Million Was Supposed to Clean Up Old Oil Wells; Instead, It’s Going to Frack New Ones
Ranking
- South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
- Inside Clean Energy: A California Utility Announces 770 Megawatts of Battery Storage. That’s a Lot.
- How Dying Forests and a Swedish Teenager Helped Revive Germany’s Clean Energy Revolution
- This drinks festival doesn't have alcohol. That's why hundreds of people came
- What to watch: O Jolie night
- The CEO of TikTok will testify before Congress amid security concerns about the app
- Maui Has Begun the Process of Managed Retreat. It Wants Big Oil to Pay the Cost of Sea Level Rise.
- Celebrity Makeup Artists Reveal the Only Lipstick Hacks You'll Ever Need
Recommendation
Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
U.S. files second antitrust suit against Google's ad empire, seeks to break it up
Southwest faces investigation over holiday travel disaster as it posts a $220M loss
Ecocide: Should Destruction of the Planet Be a Crime?
Why we love Bear Pond Books, a ski town bookstore with a French bulldog 'Staff Pup'
Former Top Chef winner Kristen Kish to replace Padma Lakshmi as host
Larry Nassar was stabbed after making a lewd comment watching Wimbledon, source says
Trump sues Bob Woodward for releasing audio of their interviews without permission